Home News Abbreviated Pundit Roundup: Redistricting as a not-so-secret Republican weapon

Abbreviated Pundit Roundup: Redistricting as a not-so-secret Republican weapon



Nick Corasaniti and Reid J. Epstein write for The New York Occasions that Republicans controlling the redistricting course of (most particularly in North Carolina on this story) proceed to make use of the method to dilute the political energy of communites of colour.

Mr. Reives is one in all a rising variety of Black elected officers throughout the nation — starting from members of Congress to county commissioners — who’ve been drawn out of their districts, positioned in newly aggressive districts or bundled into new districts the place they need to vie towards incumbents from their very own celebration.

Virtually all the affected lawmakers are Democrats, and a lot of the mapmakers are white Republicans. The G.O.P. is at the moment looking for to widen its benefit in states together with North Carolina, Ohio, Georgia and Texas, and since partisan gerrymandering has lengthy been troublesome to disentangle from racial gerrymandering, proving the motive could be troublesome.

However the impact stays the identical: much less political energy for communities of colour.

The sample has grown extra pronounced throughout this yr’s redistricting cycle, the primary because the Supreme Court docket struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act in 2013 and allowed jurisdictions with a historical past of voting discrimination to cross election legal guidelines and draw political maps with out approval from the Justice Division.

Former U.S. Lawyer Common Eric H. Holder, Jr. additionally writes for the Philadelphia Inquirer concerning the redistricting course of, taking a look at a number of states, together with Pennsylvania.

Republicans have gone out of their manner to attract maps that empower rural, predominantly white areas. They achieve this at the price of disenfranchising voters within the numerous city and suburban areas which have seen a rise in inhabitants. Republicans have deployed a number of techniques, however probably the most egregious are people who purposefully diminish the voting energy of the communities of colour: “packing” and “cracking.”

Each techniques are anti-democratic, and diminish the voting energy of communities of colour both by decreasing the variety of representatives they’re capable of elect or diluting their affect altogether. For instance, in Ohio, Republicans packed Black and Latino communities in Cuyahoga County, which incorporates Cleveland, into only one district, purposefully decreasing illustration of those communities in Congress. In the meantime, in the identical county, Republicans additionally break up aside Asian American and Pacific Islander communities into separate districts, diminishing their voting energy. In Texas, although 95% of the population growth over the last decade has come from communities of color, Gov. Greg Abbott and the Republican legislature put in place maps that will actually increase the number of majority-white districts and reduce the number of competitive districts in Texas to just one. They purposefully drew these maps to make sure that rural, white areas electorally overpower the vote of extra numerous communities.

There is no such thing as a authentic justification for these actions. It’s evident that Republicans haven’t any qualms about bending or breaking the foundations for their very own acquire and these maps present that. Their actions communicate loudly to their unwillingness to implement honest redistricting processes and create honest maps that precisely symbolize voters, and so they should be stopped — within the courts and within the states. Given what we’ve seen elsewhere within the nation, it’s important for Pennsylvanians to concentrate because the map-drawing course of reaches the important juncture of contemplating draft maps.

Kim Parker, Juliana Menasce Horowitz, and Rachel Minkin of the Pew Analysis Heart write that People are actually extra more likely to want dwelling in suburbs for a brand new motive: the COVID-19 pandemic.

About one-in-five U.S. adults now categorical a choice for dwelling in a metropolis, down from a few quarter in 2018. The share of People who want to reside within the suburbs has elevated from 42% to 46% throughout this time, whereas choice for rural areas is nearly unchanged.

No matter the place they reside, practically half of People (47% total) say the pandemic has divided their communities; comparatively few (13%) say it has introduced individuals collectively. And plenty of see an extended highway to restoration, with about one-in-five saying life of their neighborhood won’t ever get again to the way in which it was earlier than the coronavirus outbreak.

Throughout neighborhood sorts, a few quarter or extra say the well being and financial impacts of the pandemic stay main issues the place they reside, however the results are felt most acutely in cities. Greater than four-in-ten city residents (45%) say the financial impression of the outbreak is a serious drawback of their neighborhood, and 37% say the identical concerning the well being impression of COVID-19. By comparability, 31% of these within the suburbs and 33% of rural dwellers say the financial impression of the pandemic is a serious drawback of their native space, and a few quarter every say the well being impression is a serious concern.

Chabeli Carrazana writes for The Nineteenth about rising knowledge and anecdotal proof that the COVID-19 pandemic could also be altering some notions of American fatherhood.

In most households the place baby care fell aside, it was moms who had been making the selection to give up work to care for youngsters. The disintegration of care has pushed sufficient ladies out of labor prior to now two years to set off a recession. What occurred to mothers was stark: Millions left the workforce, then lots of of hundreds extra dropped out because the 2020 and 2021 college years started.

However what was taking place to dads was much less clear and, in some methods, extra sophisticated.

As of October, about 1,000,000 fewer fathers of school-age youngsters had been actively working within the labor power than pre-pandemic, in contrast with 1.4 million fewer mothers of children below the age of 18. In October, about half 1,000,000 dads between the ages of 25 and 54 had been on depart from work and one other half 1,000,000 had been unemployed, in keeping with knowledge offered to The Nineteenth by Misty Heggeness, a principal economist and senior adviser on the U.S. Census Bureau who has been intently monitoring outcomes for moms and dads in the course of the pandemic. (The accessible knowledge doesn’t mirror nonbinary individuals, however contains some LGBTQ+ dad and mom.)

These figures are all greater than pre-pandemic ranges, however nonetheless largely trending downward month-to-month since early 2020.

What the info doesn’t mirror are all the selections happening individually, between companions and between colleagues — the locations the place gender norms that had been as soon as strictly adopted, consciously or not, have gotten extra fluid.

Paul Krugman of The New York Occasions says that issues over inflation could also be overblown—on the very least, we have to reference a time aside from the the inflation of the late Seventies.

For one factor, regardless of excessive headline numbers recently, underlying inflation by the top of 2022 isn’t more likely to be anyplace close to 1980 ranges. Normal measures are at the moment unreliable due to pandemic weirdness — who knew used vehicles may loom so massive within the statistics? However probably extra strong measures just like the Atlanta Fed’s “sticky price” inflation or the Dallas Fed’s “trimmed mean” recommend {that a} Powell disinflation, if it has to occur, would begin from 3 % or 4 %, not Volcker’s 10 %. Actually, the place to begin for such a squeeze can be roughly the top level of Volcker’s squeeze, which raises the query of why we must always even hassle.

Again to that in a minute.

Even when we assume that we should get inflation right down to 2 % from, say, 3 or 4 %, that’s solely a 3rd or 1 / 4 of the Eighties adjustment. And there are causes to imagine that the associated fee can be even smaller than that comparability implies.

Various economists have advised that the present inflation seems extra like 1946-48 than just like the Seventies. Evaluating the 2 episodes is hard, partially as a result of we don’t have commonplace measures of core inflation going again that far, and total inflation was unstable as households nonetheless spent a 3rd of their revenue on meals. However one rough-and-ready option to get one thing like core inflation for the Nineteen Forties is to have a look at service costs, which had been a lot much less risky than items costs…

Corey Mintz writes for NBC Information that the follow of tipping service employees is unfair in lots of many respects.

The incident occurred in early December when a group of more than 30 diners contributed to a $4,400 tip to be break up between their two servers on the Oven and Tap in Bentonville, Arkansas. However then one of many servers, Ryan Brandt, instructed the diners that her supervisor stated the tip needed to be shared with all employees, with solely 20 % going to her. Then she was fired. (The restaurant issued a press release saying it wouldn’t disclose the rationale she was let go.) So we’ve acquired an easy-to-hate villainous restaurant supervisor, a sufferer the viewers can determine with — she has scholar loans to repay! — and a complete squadron of heroes. All of which obscures what’s really improper with this story.


When enough ideas are given out to spice up wages above the minimal hourly charge, how these ideas get divvied up lacks transparency and any assure of fairness. There is no such thing as a standardized manner of splitting ideas, and disclosure of tipping insurance policies has not but develop into a part of the anticipated data a restaurant supplies its clients.

Whereas it may appear improper that the Arkansas server had an meant tip snatched away, restaurant hosts, bartenders and bussers who don’t get handed money immediately may themselves working beneath minimal wage and counting on shared ideas from their co-workers.

That eating places have this coverage of “splitting” ideas and gratuities with the whole employees (versus reserving the tip just for the servers of a desk) is one motive I all the time carry some money after I dine in, so I can all the time put the money within the hand of whoever served me.

I additionally immediately tip bussers who I discover working their asses off. I’ve labored in eating places the place waitpersons don’t tip their bussers for clearing their tables and conserving espresso mugs crammed (amongst different assist), and, because of this, I by no means assume that waitpersons tip bussers. One of many first waitresses that I bussed for instructed me to cease working so onerous for coworkers who didn’t tip me. Inside weeks of me following her recommendation, they began tipping me.

After which there was the busy-busy 1990 Easter Sunday, with clients lined up exterior the door. One of many waitresses instructed the boss that I had stolen her $4 tip off of a desk.

The reality: I didn’t steal her cash. The shoppers put that cash in my hand and thanked me for my service. I gave that waitress the $4; in spite of everything, I had already collected practically $40 of my very own merely from being the one busser in that eating room that day.

I acquired tales …

Aleksander Brezar writes for Euronews that the 1995 Dayton Peace Accords, partially, might have sowed a number of the seeds for the difficulties going through Bosnia and Herzegovina in the present day.

One among Bosnia and Herzegovina’s three presidents, Milorad Dodik, spent the final three months pushing for legal guidelines that might see virtually half of the nation withdraw from its central establishments.

The nationalist Bosnian Serb chief is clearly aiming to weaken the nation’s central authorities, together with threats of making his personal Bosnian Serb military.

For a lot of, that is eerily just like the state of affairs that launched the 1992-1995 Bosnian Struggle and has provoked fears of a renewed battle within the nation.


Drafted to deliver the conflict to an finish in 1995, the US-sponsored Dayton Peace Accords created two most important administrative items in Bosnia — the Serb-dominated entity of Republika Srpska, or RS, and the Bosniak-Croat majority Federation of BiH.

The 2 entities got some autonomy, with an umbrella state-level authorities with its three-way presidency — with every member representing one of many three most important ethnic teams — and a council of ministers overseeing the nation’s most important establishments, together with the military, the highest judiciary, and tax administration.

It’s exactly these establishments that Dodik needs to tug out of.

Lastly in the present day, Richard Javan Heydarian writes for Al Jazeera, warning that Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos, Jr. is on monitor to develop into the subsequent president of the Philippines.

A current survey has proven that the previous dictator’s son can rely on the assist of near half of all Filipino voters within the Might 9, 2022 presidential election. His closest rival, Vice President Leonor “Leni” Robredo, has struggled to safe the assist of even only a quarter of potential voters. Having already satisfied presidential daughter Sara Duterte to develop into his operating mate, Marcos Jr at the moment enjoys a big lead simply months faraway from the election day. Because the Philippines has a single-round, first-past-the-post electoral system, the place there are not any runoff elections, Marcos Jr simply must win extra votes than all different candidates to clinch the presidency.

Former First Girl Imelda Marcos, infamous for her extravagance and rhetorical flourish, is now making ready to reclaim her place of satisfaction within the presidential palace. Whereas it’s true that Philippine elections are broadly unpredictable, the meteoric resurgence of the Marcoses is itself a stinging judgement on the profound failures of the nation’s democratic establishments. A long time of judicial impunity, historic whitewashing, corruption-infested politics and exclusionary financial development has pushed a rising variety of Filipinos into the Marcoses’ embrace.


A century in the past, Spanish novelist George Santayana warned that “those that can not bear in mind the previous are condemned to repeat it”. Within the Philippines, this warning has proved prescient. The recollections of the ache Marcos inflicted on the nation have been changed by nostalgia for an imaginary “golden age” below the late dictator. And this nostalgia, coupled with many failures of democratic politics, paved the way in which for the resurgence of the Marcoses.

Concerning that final paragraph: I do bear in mind that late Nineteenth- and early Twentieth-century thinker George Santayana was Spanish and never American, however it’s a little bit of a stretch to name Santayana a “novelist”; he solely printed one novel in his lifetime.

Everybody have an excellent day!