Home News SHAME: Vile Sharpton Present Lets Visitor Examine Professional-Lifers to ‘Suicide Bombers’

SHAME: Vile Sharpton Present Lets Visitor Examine Professional-Lifers to ‘Suicide Bombers’

14
0

On Saturday’s PoliticsNation present, MSNBC once more confirmed its hostility to pro-lifers when host Al Sharpton allowed a visitor to ridiculously liken opponents of abortion to “suicide bombers.” Here is the total quote: ” What it jogs my memory of fairly truthfully is a suicide bomber, somebody who looks like they’ve the suitable and the ethical obligation to mess up anyone else’s life for the higher good.” 

This incendiary assault on pro-life advocates satirically got here throughout a phase that began off as a dialogue of the likelihood that there have been a number of blacks who’ve been lynched in Mississippi in latest many years.

After civil rights lawyer Jill Collen Jefferson mentioned her efforts to re-investigate a number of alleged suicides to find if they could have been murders, Sharpton turned consideration to Mississippi’s try and ban abortion after 15 weeks. Apparently unconcerned concerning the giant variety of unborn black kids killed by abortion suppliers, Sharpton posed:

 

 

Legal professional Jefferson, as we speak about civil and human rights in Mississippi, I need to point out the Supreme Court docket is about to listen to arguments a couple of at present blocked state regulation that would ban all abortions after 15 weeks. And so the closely poor, younger, and black girls who stand to lose entry to the one abortion clinic within the state sounds as a lot about civil rights as abortion rights to me. What are your ideas, counselor?

Jefferson started her response: “Sure, it is a matter of civil rights. Having the suitable to an abortion is a constitutional proper. It is grounded in the suitable to privateness that’s throughout the Structure. And I discover it actually attention-grabbing that a part of this argument is an argument about, you already know, ‘the proper to an abortion just isn’t explicitly listed within the Structure.'”

She then not solely claimed that there isn’t any “proper to bear arms” within the Structure despite the fact that the Second Modification makes use of these exacts phrases, however she additionally smeared pro-lifers as being like murderers:

However you already know what? Neither is the proper to bear arms. That — the way in which that we interpret that regulation is the interpretation of a constitutional provision, the Second Modification. On this, we’re deciphering — we’re deciphering one other constitutional provision, but we’re not making use of that very same logic to the state of affairs. What it jogs my memory of fairly truthfully is a suicide bomber, somebody who looks like they’ve the suitable and the ethical obligation to mess up anyone else’s life for the higher good.

This vitriol from MSNBC was sponsored partly by RAM. Click on on the hyperlink to allow them to know what you assume. 

Transcript follows. Click on “develop” to learn extra. 

MSNBC

PoliticsNation

August 28, 2021

5:48 p.m. Japanese

AL SHARPTON: Legal professional Jefferson, as we speak about civil and human rights in Mississippi, I need to point out the Supreme Court docket is about to listen to arguments a couple of at present blocked state regulation that would ban all abortions after 15 weeks. And so the closely poor, younger, and black girls who stand to lose entry to the one abortion clinic within the state sounds as a lot about civil rights as abortion rights to me. What are your ideas, counselor?

JILL COLLEN JEFFERSON, CIVIL RIGHTS ATTORNEY: Sure, it is a matter of civil rights. Having the suitable to an abortion is a constitutional proper. It is grounded in the suitable to privateness that’s throughout the Structure. And I discover it actually attention-grabbing that a part of this argument is an argument about, you already know, “the proper to an abortion just isn’t explicitly listed within the Structure.”

However you already know what? Neither is the proper to bear arms. That — the way in which that we interpret that regulation is the interpretation of a constitutional provision, the Second Modification. On this, we’re deciphering — we’re deciphering one other constitutional provision, but we’re not making use of that very same logic to the state of affairs. What it jogs my memory of fairly truthfully is a suicide bomber, somebody who looks like they’ve the suitable and the ethical obligation to mess up anyone else’s life for the higher good.

SHARPTON: Legal professional Jill Collen Jefferson, thanks for being with us tonight.