Home News Urbicide and the Topic of Politics: Notes on the Syrian Civil Conflict

Urbicide and the Topic of Politics: Notes on the Syrian Civil Conflict

59
0

The Syrian civil struggle is without doubt one of the bloodiest, most harmful conflicts of our period. On the time of writing, ten years after the beginning of the battle, round half of Syria’s pre-2011 inhabitants has been internally displaced or fled the nation, greater than 400,000 have been killed, and huge city areas of the nation have been severely broken (International Battle Tracker 2021). This final component, the large ranges of destruction that Syria has skilled, alongside the violent re-articulation of the nation’s social geography, seem like a number of the most profound results of the civil struggle. Notably, the destruction of cities, the alteration of native areas, or the mobilisation of the constructed surroundings when conducting struggle shouldn’t be disregarded as politically irrelevant or collateral phenomena. As an alternative, my analysis is guided by a real curiosity in understanding how wartime destruction and the alteration of the constructed surroundings deeply have an effect on the dynamics of identification and are available to form the formation of political topics.

Contributing to an rising area of Syrian and non-Syrian students coping with the politics of area and wartime destruction and its located, socio-political results (Sharp 2016; al-Sabouni 2016; Azzouz 2019; Harastani and Hanna 2019; Halabi 2017), this piece is underpinned by a number of strikes. First, I present a conceptualisation of the politics of area, primarily targeted on understanding the function that materiality performs in practices of energy and resistance. Second, I suggest a studying of urbicide as a conceptual framework to discover how patterns of destruction and violent spatial reorganisation come to form political topics. Third, this contribution makes a case for a historicisation of fabric destruction in Syria. I argue that solely by understanding the circumstances of emergence and trajectory of city destruction in Syria as a part of its expertise of modernity we are able to adequately strategy the current situation. Lastly, I present an exploration of the Syrian battle by way of the lens of urbicide, detailing the other ways by which the constructed surroundings –its destruction, reorganisation and reconstruction– pertains to the reconfiguration of Syria’s polity.

The Politics of House

House, accounting for the a number of, traditionally dynamic social relations between topics and objects (Susen 2013), is constitutive of the private and the political. The varied landscapes, areas, and locations by which our identities are continuously solid consequence from the dynamic relationship between time and the all the time contested socio-political particularities of a given place. Importantly, locations are each materials and semiotic nodes – that is, locations are constituted by the piling-up of historic trajectories and tales of peoples and issues, and their boundaries are continuously made and remade.

I argue {that a} poststructuralist, relational conceptualisation of area allows a greater understanding of how practices of energy and resistance emanate in and from spatial configurations and are available to form the formation of political topics (Foucault 2009; Massey 2005; Allen 2003; Murdoch 2006). Within the final many years, some strands of poststructuralism have been criticised for privileging textuality and cultural interpretation whereas side-lining social motion and materiality (Barad 2003). Nevertheless, poststructuralist students have challenged these criticisms in IR and different associated tutorial fields. First, by understanding discourse as materials, enabling a ‘folding of the language/materials dichotomy and an expansive notion of discourse as encompassing the context by which the 2 are basically inseparable’ (Lundborg and Vaughan-Williams 2015, 5). Second, by rethinking materiality as having a major and political function in articulating subjectivity and subsequently profoundly interwoven with the sphere of energy, concepts, identities, and sensations. Therefore, the fabric is all the time fully interrelated with the discursive and the linguistic within the work of poststructuralists (St Pierre 2013), which permit us to strategy political topics as deeply embedded inside spatialised materialities.

Traditionally and within the current, operations of state energy have mobilised area and its constructed materiality to form the articulation of identities for political functions. House turns into the goal and medium of state practices of incorporation and exclusion in a number of methods, most notably by way of city planning and the geographical distribution of our bodies, and the territorial articulation of a given political financial system. As Huxley (2008, 1647) places it, areas are inseparable from initiatives of presidency and, like topics, are ‘fashioned on the inter-sections of cross-cutting powers and knowledges, imaginaries and practices.’

Though social and political forces see area as a way of creating management, domination and energy, area ‘escapes partially from those that would make use of it’ as Henri Lefebvre (1991, 26) instructed. Thus, practices of spatial domination by no means totally attain their meant targets, because the ‘dispersed, tactical, and makeshift creativity of teams or people caught within the nets of “self-discipline”’ (de Certeau 1984, xiv-xv) could problem, repurpose and subvert geographies of domination. The truth that area additionally turns into central to methods and practices of resistance exhibits the significance of creating an understanding of area as open and productive, and social classes as by no means totally stabilised and sedimented.

One can discover within the work of postcolonial students, particularly in Franz Fanon’s, an intensive understanding of how area and its constructed materiality are associated to processes of resistance and political transformation. As Jabri (2012, 72) argues, Fanon exhibits us a ‘distinctly materialist understanding of the topic of politics’ by which the reappropriation of streetscapes emerges as an act of presence and interjection, confronting oppression and giving beginning to new potentialities. Thus, by understanding mundane acts of transgression as transformative mechanisms of the connection between our bodies and world order, Fanon combines ‘the idea of area with the formation of the revolutionary topic’ (Ouaissa 2015, 105).

Relationality, mobility, and the openness of spatial identities don’t invalidate the truth that striation exists, as flows of historical past configure areas in a sure means and sediment variations and bounds. Locations even have affective and semiotic intensities – senses of place – which are formative of human subjectivity. Thus, subjectivity seems as not solely the product of our cognitive actions but in addition a distributed phenomenon throughout the completely different bodies-politic surrounding us. Therefore, writing spatial histories calls for consideration to ‘the small print and variations of historical past at specific occasions and specifically locations [and to the] confusions, contradictions and conflicts’ that construct the each day lives of individuals (Philo 1992, 141-142).

The Spatial Politics of the Metropolis at Conflict

Departing from conventional IR approaches to struggle which have targeted on violent state interactions and macro-political processes, important and feminist IR have highlighted the urgency to strategy struggle as a ‘social establishment’ (Sylvester 2013, 4) with concrete results upon located topics. A important engagement with struggle ought to search to convey the a number of methods by which struggle and violent practices ‘are implicated within the formation of the topic, in articulations of identification, and within the areas whereby the completely different renditions of struggle discover voice’ (Jabri 2007, 20).

No area is extra politically charged and extra related within the modern wrestle for social order worldwide than the area of town. From important infrastructures to squares, neighbourhoods, and houses, private and non-private city areas have more and more turn out to be securitised and conceptualised as sources of targets and threats (Campbell, Graham and Monk 2007). That is much more seen when coping with town at struggle, the place each state and non-state actors conceive town cloth as a terrain of operations and means to challenge and amplify their energy by way of the exertion of violence. Cities turn out to be occupied, divided, reshaped, re-inhabited, and destroyed underneath struggle. Crucially, late fashionable types of city warfare usually are not solely in regards to the actors’ deliberate mobilisation of the city surroundings but in addition about its reinterpretation, manipulation, and the interruption of the political classes city cloth sustains.

We will discover in an engagement with the literature on urbicide (Coward 2006; 2009; Graham 2007; Fregonese 2009; Kipfer and Goonewardena 2007; Azoulay 2013; Weizman 2006) a exceptional level of articulation for the conceptual strikes elaborated up to now in addition to a robust framework to discover the Syrian case. I strategy urbicide as a governmental dispositif (Pløger 2008) consisting of the violent spatial reorganisation of town aiming to disclaim, annihilate, or homogenise place. What’s at stake in episodes of urbicide is the heterogeneity and agonism that city area allows (Coward 2009). In such a rendering, materials destruction will not be merely collateral injury, subordinated and depending on violence instantly perpetrated towards people, however a phenomenon of its personal that ought to be explored regarding political subjectivity.

Notably exceptional in situations of urbicide is the concentrating on of infrastructural networks, that are indispensable to maintain city life and configure political subjectivity as a fancy ecology (Coward 2009). This may be seen in city peripheries within the International South, typically characterised by larger levels of informality and impoverishment, the place destruction and militarisation have disrupted the networks of resistance and survival methods by way of subaltern avenue politics (Luke 2004; Bayat 1997). From this viewpoint, the annihilation of infrastructures renders the declared enemy as ‘de-modernised by design’ (Graham 2007) for the reason that erasure of infrastructures from each day life prevents whole segments of the inhabitants from accessing the sphere of the state and see their potentialities of political company significantly suppressed.

For Graham, urbicide is an inherent a part of the advanced ontology of struggle, which ought to information our consideration to the concrete perpetrators and their particular practices aimed toward destroying the socio-material cloth of city centres. Nevertheless, city destruction shouldn’t be conceptualised as a dynamic against fashionable urbanity however reasonably as integral to peace and struggle (Virilio 2002). Overtly violent or discriminatory city planning earlier than armed battle, typically underneath the rubric of modernisation/renovation and involving mass demolitions, in addition to processes of reconstruction-through-erasure after hostilities, ought to fall underneath the understanding of urbicide.

Furthermore, there’s a ultimate layer of urbicide of paramount significance. Following Marshal Berman’s understanding of the cultural-affective dimensions of urbicide, the destruction and alteration of cities additionally entail the destruction of a way of place and ontological safety, which ‘could present the affective foundations of socio-spatial identification’ (Kipfer and Goonewardena 2007, 6). This ‘stickiness’ between the area and the topic ought to be understood as ‘an impact of the histories of contact between our bodies, objects and indicators’ (Ahmed 2004, 90), pointing at histories of previous affective encounters embedded within the materiality of the on a regular basis and their capability to form the current.

Syria: A Historical past of City Destruction

In Syria, city destruction has a historical past, and it’s important to know the circumstances of emergence that make wartime destruction each attainable and significant within the first place. City destruction is integral to Syrians’ expertise of modernity. All through the French Mandate (1920-1946), colonial violence concerned in depth spatial cartography of communities, segregative city planning and interventions, and, most paradigmatically, aerial bombing to quell insurrection.  The French bombing of Damascus in 1925, alongside a repertoire of discourses and interventions aimed toward reconfiguring area and controlling Syria’s structure of communities, had a exceptional formative impact upon the postcolonial Syrian state and its political topics.

Nevertheless, the degrees of violence, spatial mechanisms of management, and concrete destruction employed throughout the civil struggle solely make full sense in mild of later developments, significantly underneath the rule of Hafiz al-Asad. Between 1976 and 1982, Islamic militants of the Muslim Brotherhood fiercely challenged the regime with a wave of strikes, assassinations, sabotages, and armed rebellions (Lefèvre 2013). In Aleppo and later in Hama, the regime and the Muslim Brotherhood used the configuration of city area to advance or destroy the insurrection.

The showdown in Hama in early 1982 was significantly brutal. On the one hand, the occupation of a number of quarters of Hama by Brotherhood militants exhibits how the city cloth – the mosque, the alleyway, the hideout– can form and help a robust problem to state authority. However, incapable of penetrating Hama’s slender streets, the regime determined to resort to helicopter hearth, bulldozers, and artillery bombardments to face the insurrection. Metropolis quarters had been constantly raided, and whole buildings had been demolished when a suspect was recognized, turning Hama’s quarters right into a pile of rubble. The systematic mass killings throughout town’s neighbourhoods continued till the tip of February 1982, claiming the lives of hundreds of Syrians.

Urbicide seeks to extirpate the enemy from the social physique by way of destruction and uprooting. The ruination of constructed environments and our bodies organises political life by way of spatial acts of negativity, as these segments of the inhabitants recognized as enemies are rendered dispensable. Below urbicide, like underneath the state of siege, violence is all the time metonymical, directed to your entire social physique (Mbembe 2019, 82). ‘Asad wished to punish the entire of Hama’, the Syrian painter Khaled al-Khani argues. ‘By means of us, he wished to show all Syrians that difficult the regime would result in this. And it labored. It labored for 30 years’ (Atassi 2012).

In February 2012, because the civil struggle escalated, Syrians remembered Hama on the thirtieth anniversary of its bloodbath. The bloodshed in Hama,which had been lengthy subjected to silence and worry, has been recalled and explored with nice depth as if the current requested for a collective social historical past of the previous. As Salwa Ismail (2018, 139-140) places it, ‘contenting with a violent previous and discovering particular person and collective phrases of negotiating one’s relations to it has been formative of Syrians as subject-citizens underneath the Asad regime’.

The Civil Conflict and the Urbicide of Syria

The predominant function of cities within the Syrian civil struggle is straightforward to see. City and peri-urban areas have been vital theatres of struggle and areas the place completely different actors have tried to legitimise and implement competing socio-political orders. This has led to huge destruction of homes, public buildings, infrastructures, and cultural heritage virtually all through your entire nation. Greater than 53% of the Syrian inhabitants dwelling in city centres have been affected by destruction (REACH 2019, 1), 50% of Syria’s important infrastructure was deemed inoperative by 2017, and a few third of Syria’s houses had been destroyed, together with 36,000 buildings solely in Aleppo (Overton and Dathan 2019). The urbicide of Syria has had a number of registers which are value detailing.

First, each the Syrian regime and the varied insurgent armed teams which have configured the Syrian rebellion have engaged within the strategic destruction of the constructed surroundings as a mechanism to inscribe a selected socio-political and identification regime. As an example, the desecration and infrequently full erasure of Christian spiritual buildings, shrines, and lots of different iconoclastic assaults proliferated as jihadist teams (paradigmatically ISIS) grew in significance. The destruction of non secular buildings entails the lack of historic depth and goals to reshape political neighborhood by negating any chance for plurality.

The regime has blatantly resorted to urbicide, partially by its superior air energy, as a mechanism to uproot communities and, in the end, render the revolutionary topic unable to carry out political company. The sieges of the Damascene Gohuta and Jap Aleppo exactly recommend that the Syrian regime’s materials erasure and important infrastructures had been aimed toward rendering all types of resistance – armed, civil, secular, or Islamist – helpless and restricted to maintain their very survival as human beings. In the end, such a extreme type of an enemy-centric counterinsurgency marketing campaign is the product of the dearth of structural settlement between a regime, which isn’t recognised as sovereign, and the ruled, who usually are not recognised as topics (Azoulay 2013, 209).

As argued earlier, urbicide additionally entails affective, textured, and emotional layers past the strategic destruction carried out by each the regime and insurgent forces. The brutal ranges of destruction have compelled Syrians to bear the ‘surreal transformation of a identified area…the unrecognisable side of your metropolis, the disorientation, in addition to the painful loss’ (Gómez López, 2017). In Aleppo, Lina Sergie Attar says, nothing prepares you to know the brand new maps with the shifting blocks of colors and frontlines (Masahat 2018). Nothing prepares you to know the collapse of scales of loss; how the lack of dwelling, the lack of town and, in the end, the lack of reminiscence come collectively and outline the topic of struggle. The extreme destruction of town’s cloth as a ‘web site for rooting areas of spatiotemporal reminiscences’ (Brownstein 2016) entailed the erosion of the lived expertise of place and Aleppo’s distinctive sense of town. Because the novelist Khaled Khalifa places it, Aleppo turned a metropolis that now not exists, ‘however it’s defending itself and its reminiscence’ (Mahmoud and Saad 2014).

Second, the urbicide of Syria additionally refers back to the violent rearticulation of the nation’s social geography. Certainly, the struggle has compelled the division of areas, the displacement of communities, the solidification of socio-spatial boundaries, and the formation of recent territories. What’s exceptional about this spatial recomposition of the city area all through the struggle, as heterogeneity is focused and politically antagonistic enclaves are produced, is how the phenomenon of urbicide is linked to the emergence of recent meanings of energy, territory, and identification.

In Damascus and Aleppo, the regime was desirous to spend money on a discourse that activated the long-standing attachments, social behaviours, and senses of place of city Syrians alongside a blunt depiction of the opposition as threatening rural Islamists, selling an imaginary that linked the upkeep of social peace to the political survival of Asad. In most of the interviews I carried out all through 2019, rural/city, class, and sectarian narratives are sometimes intertwined with references to the constructed surroundings. What’s related about these testimonies will not be their willingness to emphasize their urbanity and differentiate town from its outskirts or peripheral neighbourhoods, however reasonably how these long-present socio-cultural notions and spatialisations are in the end mobilised to justify complete struggle upon the opposite.

Third, you will need to observe how practices of fabric destruction throughout the struggle relate to each the pre-war politics of city improvement and the politics of reconstruction. On the one hand, city renewal as redevelopment-through-demolitionwas used as a weapon of struggle in Damascus as early as 2012 (Solvang and Neistat 2014). For example, demolition plans authorized by Decree 66/2012 didn’t have an effect on areas devastated by the battle, however quarters that witnessed large demonstrations and are strategically positioned round key political and financial websites in city Damascus (Rollins 2017). However, the incipient reconstruction efforts, comparable to Marota Metropolis and Basilia Metropolis (Syrbanism 2019), alongside the authorized framework that maintain them, don’t characterize a novel city politics. Actually, the post-war reconstruction framework promoted in Syria up to now is neither “post-war” nor a “framework”. In Syria, we have now seen a set of formal and casual measures, neoliberal in spirit and really uneven in nature, that are extremely depending on the ability relations current in war-torn Syria.

In the end, as Hiba Bou Akar (2018, 182) brilliantly suggests regarding Beirut, we’re dealing in Damascus with a spatial logic of city territorial restructuring that seeks to show former war-torn peripheries into frontiers by way of ‘locking up sure geographies within the current for worry of the long run, whereas persevering with to create calculated openings for city development and actual property revenue’. By creating luxurious, prime-location actual property in areas with excessive financial potential however hitherto inhabited by decrease courses, socio-economic cleavages are additional inscribed upon the panorama.

Lastly, urbicide is central within the regime’s envisioned new social geography of loyalty. Homogeneity, on this understanding, will not be a lot associated to the creation of non secular or ethnic enclaves however reasonably on the inscription of political loyalty upon area. The patterns of fabric destruction, the spatial mapping of trusted and untrusted communities, the compelled displacement of these deemed probably threatening, and the uneven and selective early reconstruction seem as a number of the mechanisms that search to control identities and produce loyal topics. In different phrases, the politics of fabric destruction, the politics of reconciliation in former rebel-controlled areas, the politics of return of those that have been displaced, and the politics of reconstruction ought to be understood as mutually interrelated.

Conclusion

This brief contribution has sought to offer a framework by way of which Syria’s wartime spatial politics and the destruction of the city constructed surroundings may be adequately understood, considerably as these processes form strains of identification and political topics. It has tried to unravel the a number of intertwined dynamics that urbicidal violence has taken in Syria, from the strategic destruction of the constructed surroundings to the rearticulation of the city sphere in each peace and struggle to make sure political loyalty. Below urbicide, an identifiable context is erased by the amorphous cityscape, now decreased to piles of particles; continuity in place is ceased by the large displacement, which, in flip, dislocates collective reminiscence; historic specificity is negated.

Because the morphology of Syrian cities change and their socio-spatial boundaries are remade, so are Syrians. One of many far-reaching results of the civil struggle has been the rearticulation of political neighborhood: as Syrians are internally displaced and communities turn out to be tied to new areas, refugees worldwide discover themselves articulating political company by navigating in and thru exile, opening new spheres of motion and political horizons. The wrestle for city identification, preserving property rights, and reconstructing Syria’s cities by way of accountability, justice, and native company, will form the years to return. Spatial justice ought to entail a reconstruction mannequin that restores the connection of inhabitants to locations in order that return doesn’t turn out to be alienation.

References

Ahmed, S. (2004) The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Edinburgh, Edinburgh College Press.

Al-Sabouni, M. (2016) The Battle for Dwelling: The Memoir of a Syrian Architect. New York: Thames & Hudson.

Allen, J. (2003) Misplaced Geographies of Energy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Atassi, B. (2012) Breaking the Silence over Hama Atrocities. Al-Jazeera. February 2. Out there at: https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2012/2/2/breaking-the-silence-over-hama-atrocities.

Azoulay, A. (2013) When a Demolished Home Turns into a Public Sq.. In: Stoler, A. L. (ed.) Imperial Particles: On Ruins and Ruination. Durham, Duke College Press, pp. 194-224.

Azzouz, A. (2019) A Story of a Syrian Metropolis at Conflict. Metropolis 23.1: 107-122.

Barad, Okay. (2003) Posthumanist Performativity: Towards an Understanding of How Matter Involves Matter. Indicators: Journal of Ladies in Tradition and Society. 28 (3), 801-831.

Bayat, A. (1997) Road Politics: Poor Individuals’s Actions in Iran. New York, Columbia College Press.

Bou Akar, H. (2018) For the Conflict But to Come: Planning Beirut’s Frontiers. Redwood Metropolis, Stanford College Press.

Brownstein, D. (2016) Discovering Aleppo in a Conflict-Torn World [Online]. Out there at: https://dabrownstein.com/2016/09/28/finding-aleppo/ [Accessed: May 21, 2021].

Campbell, D., Graham, S. & Monk, D.B. (2007) Introduction to Urbicide: The Killing of Cities? Concept & Occasion 10 (2).

Coward, M. (2006) Towards Anthropocentrism: The Destruction of the Constructed Atmosphere as a Distinct Type of Political Violence. Overview of Worldwide Research. 32 (3), 419-437.

Coward, M. (2009) Urbicide: The Politics of City Destruction. London, Routledge.

De Certeau, M. (1984) The Apply of On a regular basis Life. Berkeley, Calif, College of California Press.

Foucault, M. (2009) Safety, Territory, Inhabitants: Lectures on the Faculty De France, 1977 – 78. London, Palgrave Macmillan.

Fregonese, S. (2009) The Urbicide of Beirut? Geopolitics and the Constructed Atmosphere within the Lebanese Civil Conflict (1975–1976). Political Geography. 28 (5), 309-318.

International Battle Tracker (2021) Civil Conflict in Syria [Online]. Out there at: https://microsites-live-backend.cfr.org/global-conflict-tracker/conflict/civil-war-syria. [Accessed: May 21, 2021].

Gómez López, M. (2017) Picturing the Homeland Carole Alfarah in dialog with María Gómez López. Ibraaz. February 5. Out there at: https://www.ibraaz.org/interviews/213 [Accessed: May 21, 2021].

Graham, S. (2007) Demodernizing by Design. In: Gregory, Derek & Pred, Allan (eds.) Violent Geographies: Worry, Terror, and Political Violence. New York & London, Routledge, pp. 309-328.

Halabi, N. (2017) The Historical Partitions of Damascus and the Siege of Mouaddamiyya: A Historic and Spatial Evaluation of Bounded Place and Cultural Id. House and Tradition. 20 (4), 441-453.

Harastani, N. & Hanna, E. (2019) The Lateral Battle of City Planning in Damascus. Open Home Worldwide. 44 (2), 20-26.

Huxley, M. (2008) House and Authorities: Governmentality and Geography. Geography Compass. 2 (5), 1635-1658.

Ismail, S. (2018) The Rule of Violence: Subjectivity, Reminiscence and Authorities in Syria. New York,Cambridge College Press.

Jabri, V. (2010) Transformations of Conflict: Views from Worldwide Political Sociology. Oxford Analysis Encyclopedia of Worldwide Research.

Jabri, V. (2012) The Postcolonial Topic: Claiming Politics/Governing Others in Late Modernity. London, Routledge.

Kipfer, S. & Goonewardena, Okay. (2007) Colonization and the New Imperialism: On the That means of Urbicide At this time. Concept & Occasion. (10) 2.

Lefebvre, H. (1991) The Manufacturing of House. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing.

Lefèvre, R. (2013) Ashes of Hama: The Muslim Brotherhood in Syria. New York, Oxford College Press.

Luke, T. W. (2014) On a regular basis Technics as Extraordinary Threats: City Technostructures and Non-Locations in Terrorist Actions. In: Graham, Stephen (ed.) Cities, Conflict, and Terrorism: In the direction of an City Geopolitics. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 120-136.

Lundborg, T. & Vaughan-Williams, N. (2015) New Materialisms, Discourse Evaluation, and Worldwide Relations: A Radical Intertextual Strategy. Overview of Worldwide Research. 41 (1), 3-25.

Mahmoud, S. & Saad, M. (2014) Interview: Khaled Khalifa’s Reminiscence of Ache. Al-Ahram. February 17. Out there at:  https://english.ahram.org.eg/NewsContent/18/0/94411/Books/INTERVIEW-Khaled-Khalifa-Syrias-memory-of-pain-.aspx. [Accessed: May 21, 2021].

Masahat (2018) My Aleppo: When Reminiscence Turns into Resistance-Lina Sergie Attar [Online Video]. Out there at: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=ufi0itMHKBo [Accessed: May 21, 2021].

Massey, D. (2005) For House. London, Sage Publications.

Mbembe, A. (2019) Necropolitics. Durham & London, Duke College Press.

Murdoch, J. (2006) Poststructuralist Geography: A Information to Relational House. London, Sage Publications.

Ouaissa, R. (2015) Frantz Fanon: The Empowerment of the Periphery. Center East: Subjects & Arguments. 5, 100-106.

Overton, I. & Dathan, J. (2019)Syria in 2020: The Lethal Legacy of Explosive Violence and its Impression on Infrastructure and Well being [Online]. Motion on Armed Violence (AOAV). December 17. Out there at: https://aoav.org.uk/2019/syria-in-2020-the-deadly-legacy-of-explosive-violence-and-its-impact-on-infrastructure-and-health/. [Accessed: May 21, 2021].

Philo, C. (1992) Foucault’s Geography. Atmosphere and Planning. D, Society & House. 10 (2), 137-161.

Pløger, J. (2008) Foucault’s Dispositif and the Metropolis. Planning Concept 7 (1), 51-70.

REACH Initiative (2019) Syrian Cities Harm Atlas [Online].REACH, Geneva. Out there at: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/reach_thematic_assessment_syrian_cities_damage_atlas_march_2019_reduced_file_size_1.pdf. [Accessed: May 21, 2021].

Rollins, T. (2017) Decree 66: The Blueprint for al-Assad’s Reconstruction of Syria? The New Humanitarian. April 20. Out there at: https://www.thenewhumanitarian.org/fr/node/259390.

Sharp, D. (2016) Urbicide and the Association of Violence in Syria. In: Sharp, Deen & Panetta, Claire (eds.) Past the Sq.: Urbanism and the Arab Uprisings. New York, Terreform.

Solvang, O. & Neistat, A. (2014) Razed to the Floor: Syria’s Illegal Neighborhood Demolitions in 2012-2013. Human Rights Watch. Out there at: https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/01/30/razed-ground/syrias-unlawful-neighborhood-demolitions-2012-2013.

St. Pierre, E. A. (2013) The Posts Proceed: Changing into. Worldwide Journal of Qualitative Research in Schooling. 26 (6), 646-657.

Susen, S. (2013) The Place of House in Social and Cultural Concept. In: Elliott, A. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Social and Cultural Concept. London, Routledge, pp. 343-367.

Sylvester, C. (2013) Conflict as Expertise. London, Routledge.

Virilio, P. (2002) Desert Display: Conflict on the Pace of Gentle. London, Continuum.

Weizman, E. (2006) Strolling By means of Partitions: Troopers as Architects within the Israeli-Palestinian battle. Radical Philosophy 136: 8-22.

Additional Studying on E-Worldwide Relations